Text 18 Apr 295 notes Your child is not an accessory: Why piercing your child’s ears is wrong.

awfulmodifications:

I see young children (anywhere between birth and 5/6 years old) with huge big blingy gold studs in their ears on a far too increasing basis. And it is extremely worrying. 

There’s multiple things that are wrong with piercing a very young infant, and I’m sure logic will prevail, even against the most vehement pro-baby piercing individuals that exist.

So, why shouldn’t we pierce children’s ears?

  1. How the heck would you like it if a stranger pinned you down and assaulted you with a sharp object totally against your will.  Assault is defined as:  ”Make a physical attack on”. Piercing without consent is most definitely a physical attack. It causes pain, and when against someone’s will, is indeed a ‘physical attack’. Did your 3 day old child say ‘Dear parents or guardians, please pierce my ears for me’? Did it? No. Of course not. Then it’s assault. It’s inflicting pain on another human being without their express permission or consent.
  2. A good reputable piercing establishment will never pierce an infant, often, a child under the age of 12 will not even be considered for a piercing. Why is this I hear you ask? A child will most likely not look after their new piercings correctly! Children are fast, excitable bundles of messy movement, always running around, bashing into things. Will they remember to get their parents to help make them a sea salt soak every evening to look after their ears? Probably not. Now I hear you ask ‘well, why shouldn’t the parents do it?’. It’s the child’s piercings, it’s the owner of the modification’s responsibility to care for them, not a parent. If a child cannot be trusted to care for a piercing, it shouldn’t have permission to get one, regardless of age. Can’t care for it? Don’t get it. Same goes for pets in my opinion, but that’s a different story.
  3. Do I even need to begin on why guns are so gosh-darn awful? Fancy being pierced with something that’s liable to be contaminated with another humans blood? That cannot be fully autoclaved, therefore can never be sterilised? Having a blunt object fired through your ear that tears a hole through flesh, rather than creating a sterile, crescent shape, perfect for jewellery insertion by a professional? Still not convinced they’re awful, read this, written by the Association of Professional Piercers: http://www.safepiercing.org/piercing/faq/#guns, and even by using a search engine and typing in ‘piercing gun’, so much more relevant literature will become available.

In short, why on earth would you subject a child to possibly gaining a life threatening infection from a gun, harming them (because they cannot give their permission, therefore, by the law, it’s classed as harm and assault), something that they will likely not care for, and will cause them pain?

Unless your child has expressed their wanting for their lobes to be pierced, don’t even think about it. And when your child does ask, for the love of all that is holy, take them to a professional.

One final question: How many of you had your ears gunned as a child, resulting in scar tissue, uneven placement and countless other complications? Would you subject a child to that without their consent?

Basically, stop doing things to your children without their consent - it is an assault and it is completely unnecessary; and stop using piercing guns! 

via .
  1. starklawz reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  2. nytterai reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  3. lets-get-invisiblee reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  4. hannibalbonhamcarter reblogged this from tawdryplaza
  5. tawdryplaza reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  6. yaboibillnye reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  7. spookyyscaryskeletons reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  8. lady-baratheon reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  9. barbieswithbettyfinn reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  10. adeleblancsec reblogged this from shadyoaks
  11. electinae reblogged this from awfulmodifications and added:
    Lol I had my ears pierced when I was seven, and I’m pretty sure the only reason my mom took me is because I wouldn’t...
  12. spaetz reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  13. circumfluent reblogged this from thevitaes and added:
    i got mine pierced with a gun too and i was fine ngl i didnt even take the piercing out and clean it i just washed my...
  14. thevitaes reblogged this from atuhm and added:
    i had my ears pierced with a gun and my god it was terrible they kept bleeding every time the piercing was taken out to...
  15. atuhm reblogged this from awfulmodifications and added:
    okay. although i agree with everything mentioned here, i got my ears pierced WITH A GUN when i was a month old. i am now...
  16. villiljos reblogged this from mygayshoes and added:
    Basically, stop doing things to your children without their consent - it is an assault and it is completely unnecessary;...
  17. hatemonstervsthelovebug reblogged this from windreaver and added:
    Walmart piercings are a terrible idea in general. Besides, what’s the fucking point of body modification if it isn’t...
  18. windreaver reblogged this from mygayshoes
  19. nauticalavenger reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  20. princeinshinyskirts reblogged this from mygayshoes and added:
    In Spain is (or at least was when I was a baby, don’t really know about nowadays) a common practice to pierce baby girls...
  21. molhouse reblogged this from mygayshoes
  22. mygayshoes reblogged this from awfulmodifications
  23. kissmeforayear answered: I got it pierced three times on one ear because the girl didn’t do it right when I was like,6 or 7.
  24. bry-in-white answered: I was pressured into getting them gunned when I was 11. It was at piercing pagoda. I was much too young and now i have horrible keloids.
  25. chibifaic answered: My own lobes were done when I was…three months? I wouldn’t know, I can’t remember. They’re uneven ‘because’ I cried the whole time.
  26. definitelynotsane answered: I got my first ear piercing done when I was two months old x.x
  27. sansanstardust answered: My ear was “gunned” when I was maybe 6 yo. The pain was so shocking that I didn’t let them pierce my other ear, so my mom took the hit.
  28. blvckmcmxci answered: I had my ears pierced a very young age and my mother looked after them every day until they were completely healed. No infection. No risks.
  29. goddess-of-somethingorother answered: When I was young, I remember having my ears pierced. I also remember one getting infected because the gun put the back on too tightly.
  30. brofistingsquad answered: I got my ears pierced for the second time at Claire’s when I was 9 or 10. The gun actually got stuck on my ear.
  31. gonadus answered: i totally agree. i was probably about 4 and had trouble with my ears being irritated literally until i was about 8 even with jewelry out
  32. queermindsfuckalike answered: I had mine pierced at Claire’s at 9, and she did one at an angle, plus they took over two years to heal fully and I now have scar tissue.
  33. crashinthesky answered: I had my ears pierced when I was a baby, a nurse did it with my own gold earring. It never got infected, but I agree piercing kids is WRONG.

Design crafted by Prashanth Kamalakanthan. Powered by Tumblr.